The global impact of the American anti -abortion movement

In the United States, March each year is the Women’s History Month to commemorate the contribution of women to American history and culture.This “traditional” was originally “Women’s History Week”, which was originally “Women’s History Week” of local groups in the 1970s. Until 1981, the U.S. Congress established the first official National Women’s History Week, and in 1987, the National Women’s History Week was extended to women across the country to women across the country.History month.On March 1st this year, US President Biden announced the announcement of “praising the brave women who helped the United States to build a more fair and fair society” and called on “May we continue to work hard to create a woman and girls worth all women and girls.The world of dreams and goals. “Major mainstream media in the United States have also opened up columns to praise outstanding women.

On January 19, 2024 local time, in Washington, USA, demonstrators participated in the anti -abortion parade in front of the parliamentary building.

At the same time, the fertility right obtained by American women through half a century of feminist struggles is rapidly replaced by the unfairness of fertility, and the attack of conservative party fertility rights is not limited to the United States.The will to be strong in other countries, bringing catastrophic consequences to millions of poor women around the world.

On March 22, 2024, Julie Bindel, a British feminist sportsman Julie Bindel, published an article entitled “The Wars of the United States on the Rights of Maternity Rights in the World” on the Peninsula Television.The US anti -abortion movement has a bad influence on Britain and the entire European women.

Bentell wrote that in 2022, the US Supreme Court overthrew the Miles in 1973, a milestone Roy Corporation, which denied the abortion rights given by the Women’s Constitution.Since then, 28 states have restricted abortion according to the age of fetal age, and the scope of the ban has been from 6 to 24 weeks.Except for a few exceptions, abortion was almost completely banned in another 14 states.For example, in Edhata, abortion is allowed to be allowed to abandon the police only when rape or incest cases have been reported to the police or to prevent pregnant women from death.Indiana has also implemented a similar ban, and in Kentucky and Louisiana, unless there is a medical emergency or a pregnant “Medically Future”, abortion is forbidden.

Some people have intensified, not only to establish the right of the fetus higher than the right of women, but even the right of frozen embryos in the laboratory is higher than that of women’s rights.Just last month, the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that according to state laws, frozen embryos enjoyed the same right as children.This puzzling judgment was made for the “non -normal death” claims proposed by the three couples, and their frozen embryo was accidentally destroyed in a maternity clinic.

The judge quoted the scriptures in the Bible and ruled that a state law called the “Undead Death Act” in 1872 allowed the parents of the late child to seek punitive compensation.”Caused by anyone’s wrong behavior, inaction or negligence” may be suitable for “all unborn children, no matter where they are.”This ruling will have a profound impact on the legality of the fertilization of in vitro in the United States, and in vitro fertilization itself has problems, because it promotes surrogacy business.However, more importantly, this ruling has a wide impact on women’s autonomy.This means that any man who allows women to become pregnant -even through rape -they can sue the woman to seek abortion at any time of pregnancy based on the “Undead Death Act”.

Binger believes that this blatant war against women’s fertility and physical autonomy should not only attract the attention of Americans, but also attract the attention of European feminist, especially the author’s Britain.Not only because we should expose and challenge the threat to women’s rights anywhere, but also because of the cultural norms and political views that form a momentum in the United States, it will have a significant impact on British politics, which will have a significantInfluence.

In fact, in the past few decades, with the anti -abortion movement began to achieve legal and political progress in the United States, similar trends have also emerged.

Since 2015, The Pro-Life All Party Parliamentary Group (abbreviated APPG) has been committed to the withdrawal of abortion in all parts of the UK.Over the past four years, Right To Life UK, the main anti -abortion charities, has been the secretariat of this cross -party organization.In 2021, when the feminist initiated a campaign and requested that the abortion was completely legalized, the charity published an advertisement, calling on supporters to prevent parliament from introducing “extreme” laws, that is, “introducing abortion for any reason before birth.”

Since October 2022, Maria Caulfield, a conservative party member of the Lewis constitutional constituency, has been the Deputy Secretary of State of the parliament responsible for women’s affairs, mental health and women’s health strategy.Kolfield supported the reduction of abortion time and voted against the establishment of a buffer outside the abortion clinic.She is the vice chairman of APPG and has voted to oppose the legalization of Northern Ireland abortion.

Bentell criticized that such an open and proud abortion right opponent was appointed as the Women’s Minister. The fact itself was shocking, which showed that the government and those attempts to restrict British women’s rights and freedoms were contaminated.

Calfield said the Britain’s 1967 “Abortion Law” was “one of the most free abortion laws in the world”, which allowed practitioners registered in the UK to abandon some cases.But this is unreal. Britain has the strictest abortion law in the world. So far, women are still sent to prison for “illegal” abortion.

In fact, in June 2023, a British woman was sentenced to 28 months’ imprisonment for 28 months due to the statutory restrictions that exceeded 24 weeks of pregnancy after the COVID-19 blockade in 2020.After the appeal, her sentence was reduced to 14 months and slowed down, but this case was a clear warning for all women, that is, this situation may also happen to them.

Feminist now demands that thorough reform has led to outdated laws based on the 44 -year -old mother’s mother.These laws can be traced back to the “Offices Against The Person Act” in 1861, and according to the bill, all abortion is criminal acts -except for the abortion of the lives of mothers.The “Abortion Law” in 1967 legalized the abortion provided by the authorized provider, but this was only amended to the 1861 bill, and the latter was never abolished.Therefore, in the UK, it is still illegal to stop pregnancy unless it meets certain conditions.

The “Abortion Law” was initially allowed to terminate pregnancy within 28 weeks. By 1991, the restrictions were reduced to 24 weeks, that is, the fetus can survive outside the uterus.Today, in the UK, only when life is dangerous, or the child she is pregnant may suffer from severe disability, women can abandon after 24 weeks of pregnancy.The highest crimes stipulated in the Crime of Everbright can be sentenced to life imprisonment.Prosecution is rare, but according to the data obtained by England and Wales’s “Freedom of Information”, 67 women were tried from 2012 to 2022 for “illegal abortion”.

Although the overthrow of the Roy’s case did not directly affect the British abortion law, it undoubtedly strengthened the prestige for anti -abortion people, and many of them joined forces to propagate to the public with the United States.Some anti -abortion activities outside the abortion clinic are also increasing.Binder believes that this is because when the world’s largest democratic country has abandoned the protection of federal abortion rights, many anti -abortion activists have begun to feel more optimistic about their opportunities to achieve changes in the UK.

Bentell said that in the UK, there are still many fighting to fight before we can claim to stand on the side of women’s reproductive health and choice.Until recently, in Northern Ireland, abortion is allowed only in the most special case.Although theoretically, abortion is now allowed, but the Ministry of Health often refuses to commission abortion services, making many women still have to go to England to exercise their fertility rights.This problem is not limited to Northern Ireland -according to the BACK Off Scotland of the organization supporting abortion, many women there are forced to go to England for mid -term abortion, that is, between the 13th and 26th weeks, because the actual situation of Scotland’s Health Commission is actual.Abortion is not provided within 24 weeks of legal restrictions.From 2019 to 2022, at least 170 Scottish abortion customers were transferred to England for abortion by doctors.

On July 7, 2018, local time, Belfaster, Britain, supports abortion groups in Northern Ireland to hold a parade and support the abolition of abortion.

In the UK, women seeking legal abortion are facing bureaucracy nightmares, while the huge and active anti -abortionists are annoyed in the narrative of anti -abortion.

Bentell wrote, this is why when the Roy’s suicide was overthrown, many British reactions were angry, and this is why we watched the continuous backstream of American fertility with fear and worry.We support American sisters to fight for their rights, and we also know that what happened there would have an impact on Britain.

In the US presidential election in November, abortion rights will become the primary topic.This election will determine whether the mighty fertility rights of American women will face further attacks, or have the opportunity to cooperate with the damage caused by the damage caused by the reversal of the Roy’s case.However, regardless of the outcome of this election, women in all countries in the world, including women in the UK, will continue to be affected by the US Supreme Court decided not to provide constitutional chain reactions for abortion rights.

Compared with British and European women’s attacks and rebounds on anti -abortion campaigns in the United States, women in the world’s least developed countries and regions are facing a more cruel impact.On March 18th, the president of the Fuller Project, the president of the Washington Branch and senior journalist Jodi Enda, published in The New Republic, entitled “The terrible global anti -abortion campaign in the United States anti -abortion movement worldwide”Long report of influence.It is reported that the painful abortion experience of Kenya Kibella sluman women named Editar Ochieng began.Although the process is painful, Oin is already lucky than most women in Kenya, at least she survives.

Enda wrote that most of the Kenya women who faced unexpected pregnancy did not have a good choice.In the culture of their lives, women have almost no autonomy to their bodies. They experience high poverty -two -thirds of residents’ living expenses per day less than $ 3.2, and they are also struggling to deal with the abortion stipulated in the 2010 constitution of the country in the country.Law and the conflict between the older and stricter criminal law are still being implemented.Because the criminal law set abortion as criminal criminal criminals, only when health professionals determined that their lives or health are in danger, or their pregnancy is caused by rape can they legally perform abortion surgery.The last exception was implemented after 2019, and it was rarely applied.

Despite the ban, more than 500,000 Kenyan women have abortion each year.A few capable people may find a well -trained professionals who are willing to perform secret but safe abortion.Many times, women choose the way of adventure, reminiscent of the “hanger era” before the Roy sued Wade’s case.The country’s abortion rights advocate said they used weaving needles and ingesting dangerous chemicals.If you can’t abandon, some women will kill healthy newborns, throw them into the river, or poison them with cocoa.This is the situation where the country lives in extreme poverty.

If the operation is properly operated, abortion is considered extremely safe.However, according to the World Health Organization, nearly half of the 73 million abortion (45%) of 73 million abortion around the world is not safe.Others believe that this proportion is even higher. In Sahara, three -quarter abortion is considered unsafe.The World Health Organization has confirmed that global unsafe abortion has caused 39,000 maternal deaths and millions of complications each year. This is a prevention of calamity, but it is still tortured women in developing countries.

Enda believes that an important reason for this situation is the anti -abortion policy in the United States.

For half a century, the United States has been using fiscal forces to force the more poor countries to abide by the anti -abortion values of the United States, or give up the assistance to family planning, and the recent assistance to other medical care.These policies have been touted to reduce abortion, but in fact, the number of abortion has actually been significantly increased, resulting in tens of thousands of unnecessary maternal deaths.

Anti -abortion policies can lead to more abortion in violation of intuition, unless considering those organizations that perform, consult and educate people’s abortion, they usually provide condoms, pills, in -palace birthpots, and other forms of contraceptive measures.If health care providers provide abortion, they may lose funds for broader health services including contraception.There are fewer contraceptive measures equal to more accidental pregnancy; more accidental pregnancy is equal to more abortion; in countries that strictly restrict abortion, more abortion is equal to more unsafe abortion; more unsafe abortion means meaningMore pregnant women die.

Even if the internal politics and cultural conflicts of other countries should not be blamed in the United States, as the world’s largest medical career, it is critical.In essence, this country has no choice but to seek private abortion in this country. Some people are sent to the emergency room and others are sent to the grave.

The report will be analyzed in detail the impact of the United States on abortion policies in other countries such as Mexico, and the formation mechanism of these influences.At the end of the article, Enda quoted the words of the Kenyan girl Ochin at the beginning of the article: Ochin and other abortion rights advocates said that if Washington ended those restricted policies for the healthy and life of women in the United States, there may beDifferent.This influence is the most obvious in the country with extensive abortion rights.Even in a place like Kenya, it will reduce the number of unsafe abortion and death of pregnant women, and may begin to change the compression culture.”When the United States makes any decisions, the reality is that it directly affects a woman who is on the spot, a very, very poor woman.” “We can’t wait until so many women died before making changes.”

The moral front and legal dilemma of climate actionist

In October 2022, the two climate actionist at the National Art Museum in London, England, splashed a pool of tomato soup towards Van Gogh’s masterpiece “Sunflower”.Perhaps thanks to Van Gogh’s popularity, the actions of this group of environmentalists who are concerned about climate change can also be fermented in public opinion, causing controversy.Due to the protection of glass frames, Van Gogh’s masterpiece was not damaged, and the two “raids” paintings subsequently stuck their palms on the walls of “Sunflower”, and began to shout them loudly.Ask.Both climate actionists are members of the environmental organization called “Just Stop Oil/JSO”, which has been committed to calling on people to reduce dependence and excessive development of fossil fuels.

Two actors also questioned on the spot on the spot, “What is more important? Art or life? Is (art) more valuable than food? Is it more valuable than justice? You are more concerned about the protection of a painting, or is it right?The protection of the planet and the people? … Millions of hungry and cold families cannot afford fossil fuel; they can’t even afford a can of soup. “Subsequently, the two actors were arrested by the police.Regardless of the logic of the discussion, the JSO organization has been acting and concentrated its goals in the art museum and museum at that time.Before Van Gogh and “Sunflower”, Da Vinci and “Last Dinner”, Potcheli, Turd, and Constance Bull were also stared at by members of JSO. They were “attacked”.The method is similar.

On October 14, 2022, local time, two protesters threw tomato soup to Van Gogh’s famous work “Sunflower” in 1888.

Although JSO’s assault on art and art museums has happened nearly two years ago, other climate actors -whether before or after that -have never stopped protests.In the summer of 2019, a group of green and peaceful climate protection actors boarded the oil drilling platform of Scot Romiti to try to resist further offshore oil mining.Of course, all kinds of data and early warning from official channels are supporting the rationality of the climate actionist.In recent years, the United Nations has rarely stopped at high temperature early warnings, and it has refreshed a historical average high -temperature record every year; more and more “climatic refugees” have been forced to migrate because of environmental changes.In contrast, in the United States, the country’s power grid system is not ready to transition to clean power.Professor Brett Christopher, a professor at the University of Upzara University, Sweden, recently voted in the “Time” magazine, bluntly stated that “capitalism cannot save climate crisis”, even if clean energy has developed to a certain extent, capitalismThe economic model is also doomed to the bottleneck of clean energy.Because most countries mainly rely on private sectors to promote faster renewable energy investment, and private owners invest on expected profits, however, the profitability of renewable energy has been on the question mark.

On March 15th, on the theater stage of Broadway, New York, climate actionists once again attracted the attention of public opinion.A group of protesters interrupted the performance during the performance of Iboson’s “People’s Public Enemy”. Several people took off their jackets and showed the slogans that they called for climate change to everyone.In social media, protests also carried out simultaneously: the behavior of these climate actionists was sent to their fellow on the social platform X (Twitter), and bluntly stated that the climate actionist “is not the public enemy ‘, likeFossil fuel criminals such as ExMobil and Chevron are only “.In the end, these protesters were taken away by the New York police, but they were not charged.This time, the European and American climate actionist seemed to be aimed at the theater, because similar things happened in the performance of the “Tragic World” in the West District of London not long ago.

However, compared to the more eye -catching action of public opinion in the art museum and theater, from mid -March, many European environmentalists, like people who have been on the Coretty Drilling platform in 2019, try to block the relay.The infrastructure of various countries around Beihai is part of the new Beihai oil and natural gas mining operations.A protesters in Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden took the lead in launching, blocking the oil and natural gas terminals, refineries and ports of the four countries.It is believed that the six large -scale fossil fuel producers in Beihai are not prepared to stop drilling to meet the standards set by the Paris Climate Agreement.In Norway, the protesters shouted the slogan of “Fossil Free North Sea”, condemning the government and other North Sea countries to take care of the consensus of Paris Climate Agreement and insisting on mining new oil and natural gas resources.The climate crisis further deteriorated, bringing inevitable disasters to other places in the world.In the Netherlands, Shell Petroleum Corporation’s largest refinery in Europe was also blocked by actors; the same is the same as the Petroleum port in Gothenburg, Sweden.After the Scottish people began to post slogans and join the blockade, it is expected that the protesters in Denmark will also follow the protests.

However, although the European and American climate actionists show the vision and courage of saving the climate, saving the earth and the victims in their demands, their destruction may be sanctioned by law, especially in the next step, especially inU.K.Among many people participating in the climate crisis protests, many people are practicing physicians in the UK, but the Guardian reported on March 16, saying that once these doctors have been confirmed by the disciplinary inspection department in the industry, they have confirmed that there is a cross -track track.Behavior, their doctors’ licenses will be revoked.The report mentioned that a doctor named Sarah Benn was facing allegations and investigations.Earlier, she was a general doctor in Birmingham. In recent years, more and more participation in directly acting to protest against the government’s inaction of climate change, including the door to the door of the commercial, energy and industrial departments as the members of the JSO members have done.superior.Benn has also repeatedly received warnings, including suspected blocking highways and the use of drones in limited areas.Her actions in the Ginusbury Wharf in Wolk County violated local civil law and were detained for 31 days.Today, she is facing a special court formed by the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) of medical staff to determine whether she can retain her practice license.She will be one of the three doctors who have been fired due to climate actionism this year, and will be the first trial in April.